[Craic] Joe Rogan podcast on Dr. MaLONE --mRNA vaccines provide NEGATIVE protection against omicron after three months

[Arthur Blomme]

Dr. Paul

In my conversations with you I know that you more than most are open to 
new information.  That for me is key to getting back to normal relations 
in our society.  We know so much more about the virus today that we 
didn't know when the pandemic began.  For me, Science is about adapting 
our beliefs to meet the new information we have acquired as time passes.

You said that you watched a bit of the Joe Rogan  video, but you said 
that you stopped the video when it contradicted your belief about the 
vaccine effectiveness. The Dr. Malone video turned out to be one of Joe 
Rogan most popular podcasts ever viewed 
https://rumble.com/vrv7k1-dr.-robert-malone-on-joe-rogans-podcast.html, 
it currently has 11million views on the different platforms that it is 
available .  In the main news there is a clamor to have the video taken 
down.  Malone was banned from TWITTER which marked a grand exit from 
twitter to gettr.

I would think that if you wished to understand the alternative consensus 
being developed, you might want to listen to the whole podcast.  I am 
also including a Joe rogan interview of Cornel West to get another 
flavour of Joe Rogan.<https://youtu.be/xyuRIt7IDxM>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTWzzzE9ktY&list=WL&index=1&t=147s>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTWzzzE9ktY&list=WL&index=1&t=147s>Joe 
Rogan Opens Door To Cornel West’s Brilliance 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTWzzzE9ktY&list=WL&index=1&t=147s>
The Rationa <https://www.youtube.com/c/Therationalnational>

Here is a study that supports Malones comments about negative 
effectiveness.  Of course this study is preprint and there are other 
interpretation of the data. But the graph below is used consistently in 
the literature to represent the data.

Art


Study: mRNA vaccines provide NEGATIVE protection against omicron after 
three months — they make you more likely to catch it 
<https://wentworthreport.com/2021/12/30/study-mrna-vaccines-provide-negative-protection-against-omicron-after-three-months-they-make-you-more-likely-to-catch-it/>. 
By Christian Hansen et al 
<https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v2.full-text>.

 From a Danish study of vaccine effectiveness (VE) — which is the 
percentage reduction in likelihood of catching covid, compared to being 
unvaccinated.

    The VE is significantly lower than that against Delta infection and
    declines rapidly over just a few months.

This graph shows that the vaccine effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines 
against omicron turns sharply negative after 90 or so days:

In other words, if you don’t have a booster, after three months your 
double jab of Pfizer makes you /more/ likely than an unvaccinated person 
to catch omicron.

Which is why governments are so keen for everyone to have a booster 
every three months.

Everything about this first generation of “vaccines” turns out to be 
disappointing. Now we find out they make you /more/ likely to catch the 
disease, after just three months? What next?? That they give you 
cumulative heart damage??? A little bit more scar tissue each time…

What if, for the next variant, the vaccine effectiveness turns negative 
after only two months? What happens when human immune systems start 
getting fatigued (as they will), after being stimulated so much?

NFI. Screwing it up every which way.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.integralshift.ca/pipermail/craic-integralshift.ca/attachments/20220120/5b8be672/attachment.html>