<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Remo
</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughtful response.</p>
<p>I was interested in learning more regarding your comments on neoliberalism at the zoom meeting.. Youmentioned two sources that you were reading I was wondering if you could share those sorces on the list.</p>
<p>Couple of years ago Brian Topp suggested this book. Explains the role of the Koch brothers in the development of neo-liberalism.
</p>
<p>Art
</p>
<a
href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/14_QAJijPXt9g8Yw1Ai4a0oBHSRj9kBuR/view?usp=sharing"><img
moz-do-not-send="false"
src="cid:part1.03875A62.DC8D9E76@integralshift.ca" alt=""
shrunked:resized="true" width="211" height="325" border="0"
align="left"></a>
<table style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px;
margin-right:37px;" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style=" vertical-align:top;" bgcolor="transparent">
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><span style=" font-weight:600; background-color:transparent;">Authors:</span></p>
</td>
<td style=" vertical-align:top;" bgcolor="transparent">
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/14_QAJijPXt9g8Yw1Ai4a0oBHSRj9kBuR/view?usp=sharing"><span style=" color:#0000ff;">Nancy MacLean</span></a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style=" vertical-align:top;" bgcolor="transparent">
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><span style=" font-weight:600; background-color:transparent;">Formats:</span></p>
</td>
<td style=" vertical-align:top;" bgcolor="transparent">
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><a href="action:7b2270617468223a2022433a5c5c55736572735c5c4172746875725c5c476f6f676c652044726976655c5c65626f6f6b735c5c4e616e6379204d61634c65616e5c5c44656d6f637261637920696e20436861696e73202831313429222c2022666d74223a202245505542222c202274797065223a2022666f726d6174222c2022666e616d65223a202244656d6f637261637920696e20436861696e73202d204e616e6379204d61634c65616e222c2022626f6f6b5f6964223a203131347d"><span style=" color:#0000ff;">EPUB</span></a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style=" vertical-align:top;" bgcolor="transparent">
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><span style=" font-weight:600; background-color:transparent;">Path:</span></p>
</td>
<td style=" vertical-align:top;" bgcolor="transparent">
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/14_QAJijPXt9g8Yw1Ai4a0oBHSRj9kBuR/view?usp=sharing"><span style=" color:#0000ff;">Click to open</span></a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><a name="comments"></a><span style=" font-weight:600;">W</span><span style=" font-weight:600;">inner of the </span><span style=" font-weight:600; font-style:italic;">Los Angeles Times</span><span style=" font-weight:600;"> Book Prize
Finalist for the National Book Award
</span><span style=" font-weight:600; font-style:italic;">The Nation</span><span style=" font-weight:600;">'s "Most Valuable Book"
"[A] vibrant intellectual history of the radical right . . ." – </span><span style=" font-weight:600; font-style:italic;">The Atlantic</span><span style=" font-weight:600;">
"This sixty-year campaign to make libertarianism mainstream and eventually take the government itself is at the heart of </span><span style=" font-weight:600; font-style:italic;">Democracy in Chains</span><span style=" font-weight:600;">. . . . If you're worried about what all this means for America's future, you should be" – NPR
An explosive exposé of the right's relentless campaign to eliminate unions, suppress voting, privatize public education, stop action on climate change, and alter the Constitution.
</span>Behind today's headlines of billionaires taking over our government is a secretive political establishment with long, deep, and troubling roots. The capitalist radical right has been working not simply to change who rules, but to fundamentally alter <span style=" font-style:italic;">the</span> rules of...
</p>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;">
</p>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;">
</p>
<style type="text/css">
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Also This Book.</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><a
href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EKuqUxs5HeWYHkdKOKZ-LQ7yvYfg8KnC/view?usp=sharing"><img
moz-do-not-send="false"
src="cid:part7.F9DD70B7.055F6861@integralshift.ca" alt=""
shrunked:resized="true" width="196" height="295" border="0"
align="left"></a>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;">
</p>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;">
</p>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;">
</p>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;"><a name="comments" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EKuqUxs5HeWYHkdKOKZ-LQ7yvYfg8KnC/view?usp=sharing" moz-do-not-send="true"></a><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EKuqUxs5HeWYHkdKOKZ-LQ7yvYfg8KnC/view?usp=sharing" moz-do-not-send="true"><span style=" font-weight:600;">A</span><span style=" font-weight:600;"> look at the top 200 most powerful players in world capitalism, who are at the controls of our economic future.</span></a>
Who holds the purse strings to the majority of the world's wealth? There is a new global elite at the controls of our economic future, and here former Project Censored director and media monitoring sociologist Peter Phillips unveils for the general reader just who these players are. The book includes such power players as Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Jamie Dimon, and Warren Buffett.
As the number of men with as much wealth as half the world fell from sixty-two to just eight between January 2016 and January 2017, according to Oxfam International, fewer than 200 super-connected asset managers at only 17 asset management firms—each with well over a trillion dollars in assets under management—now represent the financial core of the world's transnational capitalist class. Members of the global power elite are the management—the...</p>
<style type="text/css">
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/16/20 7:48 a.m., Remo Brassolotto
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:FFD67365-92DF-49A0-9C3F-4BE180AF812F@gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
Hi Art,
Thank you for the essay and bringing much needed attention to Laudato Si.
I’ll just comment on “Technocracy” if I may. It’s not a widespread concept with general familiarity to provide insight into our world today. Francis quotes Romano Guardini whom he studied years ago and who died in ‘68. I would gravitate more to using the the neoliberal ideology as a better way to explain our situation. It has broader focus. As an economic theory that has bled into the political realm and beyond, it has more explanatory power.
At its core - brought to us by Friedrich Hayek and Milton Freedman principally I believe, it states that a free and open marketplace is the best way for the economy to function. It will find the best, organic way to grow our economy and secure our freedom. Capitalism functions best with such a an approach to markets. The role of government is simply to insure an open marketplace is able to function. That means for the most part “hands off.” Small, stable government is best for markets. What has happened of course is that markets have become global and as such avoid controls or limitations being put on them. At that level regulation of their activities is much harder to enforce.
Our liberal democracies in the West have moved over recent decades to try to reduce the size of government by finding efficiencies, deregulation, tax breaks, balancing budgets, and privatizing as much as possible. The contention is that the marketplace, the private sector, is the most efficient way of solving problems - whatever they are - healthcare, education, prisons, etc.
But what about morals and values? Well, our traditional western morality has served us well and should be what we promote - family, individual freedom, etc. even though that morality is largely patriarchal, sexist, racist and so on. As for values, they have become unmoored from their base with little holding power because the focus remains on the open marketplace, and values don’t figure in.
Having said that, it’s not always to the advantage of the neoliberal ideology to have instability and social unrest. That’s not good for markets. This unforeseen situation is unaccounted for except perhaps with a strong ‘law and order’ position.
The upshot of this situation is that it is anti-democratic. It has allowed governments to accept the powerful lobbies of big money and what has been lost is the will of the people and the common good. They way forward may well involve many things for sure, but fundamentally regulation of markets and acceptance of current morals and values based on principle.
Sorry, Art, this has gone in a direction that may not be the kind of response that is helpful. Getting back to technology, I think it remains a tool and it’s how we use it that is the issue. And science, too, needs to be respected and seen in perspective. Throughout the encyclical, Francis does rely and respect science. It’s how we know what the world has come to.
Perhaps I’ll leave it there for now.
Remo
Sent from my iPad
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On Oct 15, 2020, at 5:55 PM, Arthur Blomme <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:art@integralshift.ca"><art@integralshift.ca></a> wrote:
Hi all
I am re-sending the essay on Technocracy, Pandemic Response and Laudato Si, a PDF version this time. The previous version I sent you is missing a paragraph which disrupts the flow of the argument a bit. It is a short paragraph but disruptive.
In Solidarity
Art
<Technocracy, Pandemic Response and Laudato Si.pdf>
_______________________________________________
craic mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:craic@lists.integralshift.ca">craic@lists.integralshift.ca</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.integralshift.ca/listinfo.cgi/craic-integralshift.ca">http://lists.integralshift.ca/listinfo.cgi/craic-integralshift.ca</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>