<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span>From
Tamara Plant Dancer, [12/11/25 6:22 AM] on a Telegram group
today:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br>
<div><span>Kill Bill S-206! ⚠️<b> A legislative blitz to hide one
central pillar: Bill S-206. </b>They are flooding
Parliament with distraction bills so the public is overwhelmed
and cannot see the one bill that makes the entire system
possible. More than a dozen federal bills are advancing
simultaneously — each attacking a different pillar of Canadian
freedom. They fall into clear clusters: </span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span><b>Bills attacking due process and court rights</b></span></div>
<div><span>Bill S-206 — Administrative Monetary Penalties (the
central pillar) enables penalties without hearings, judges,
trials, or <b>common-law protections.</b></span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-63 — Online Harms Act. Undefined “harm,” digital
speech penalties, CRTC enforcement authority.</span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-27 — Digital Charter Act. Creates federal AI
regulators empowered to issue compliance orders without court
oversight.</span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-52 — Beneficial Ownership Transparency. Expands
federal surveillance and administrative enforcement.</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span><b>Bills attacking parliamentary supremacy (power shift
to agencies).</b></span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-26 — Critical Cyber Systems Act. Sweeping
regulation by order-in-council, bypassing Parliament.</span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-11 — Online Streaming Act. Gives the CRTC
unprecedented control over content curation and digital reach.</span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-18 — Online News Act. Allows federal regulators
to determine access to, and compensation for, digital
journalism.</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span><b>Bills attacking property rights.</b></span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-234 — Agricultural Fuel Restrictions. Expands
federal control over farm operations and production.</span></div>
<div><span>Bill S-241 — Jane Goodall Act. Sweeping bio-safety
authority over wildlife, land, and private property.</span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-49 — Atlantic Accord Amendments. Expands federal
control over offshore land, climate restrictions, and energy
development.</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span><b>Bills attacking freedom of speech and assembly</b></span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-63 — Online Harms Act. Criminalizes undefined
“harm,” empowers bureaucrats to judge speech.</span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-261 — Misleading Communications Act. Penalties
for “misleading” <b>speech</b> — undefined and discretionary.
(is your phone listening?)</span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-70 — Foreign Interference Act. Mass surveillance
powers with vague thresholds.</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span><b>Bill attacking religion freedom</b></span></div>
<div><span>Bill C-9 — “Harmful Conduct” Redefinition. Allows the
state to regulate spiritual beliefs and pastoral work under
“harm.”</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span><b>The critical pattern. Different bills, different
sectors and different rights being attacked. But here is the
truth: Every single one of these bills depends on ONE
central enforcement pillar, and that pillar is:</b></span></div>
<div><span>Bill S-206 — The Administrative Penalty Switch</span></div>
<div><span>Bill S-206, the hub of the entire system, gives federal
departments the power to issue penalties without:</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ a hearing</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ a judge</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ a trial</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ due process</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ common-law protections</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ judicial review in practice</span></div>
<div><span>It turns federal agencies into their own courts —
investigator, prosecutor, judge, and enforcer. No democracy on
Earth should tolerate this.</span></div>
<div><span><b>This is the enforcement engine behind:</b></span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Digital ID</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ CBDCs</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Carbon allowances</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Biosafety / One Health rules</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Smart-meter penalties</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Travel scoring</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Online speech controls</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Zoning & land-use mandates</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span>Data alone cannot control a population. They need the
power to punish. S-206 provides it. Remove the keystone → the
arch collapses.</span></div>
<div><span><b>Why scatter us with other bills? Because if
Canadians focus on S-206, the agenda dies. The distraction
bills serve one purpose:</b></span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ to scatter attention and exhaust the public.</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ to keep citizens debating side issues</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ to hide the enforcement bill under noise</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ to make resistance impossible to organize</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ to create outrage fatigue</span></div>
<div><span><b>This is how large control systems are built —
through distraction around the edges while the core is
slipped into place.</b></span></div>
<div><span>What are they building - and why S-206 is the core.
Here is the architecture of the planned digital-governance
system:</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Digital ID → who you are</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ CBDCs → what you buy</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Carbon scoring → how you move & heat your home</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Online harms laws → what you say</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Smart meters → how you use utilities</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Bio-safety / One Health → what you grow, raise, or
own</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Zoning & climate programs → where you can live
and build</span></div>
<div><span><b>But these systems cannot control people without
instant punishment.</b></span></div>
<div><span><b>That punishment system = Bill S-206. S-206 even
enables conditions on federal benefits, including:</b></span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ pensions</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ old age security</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ disability payments</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ income supports</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span><b>Departments under health and social development
could attach requirements involving:</b></span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ vaccination</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ digital ID compliance</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ health status tracking</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ “population health” goals (including reproductive
metrics)</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span><b>Covid revealed the blueprint. S-206 provides the
legal mechanism. Our strategy must be laser-focused. We can
fight 20 bills and lose…</b></span></div>
<div><span><b>Or we can defeat the one bill that enables all the
others.</b></span></div>
<div><span><b>If S-206 falls:</b></span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Digital ID enforcement collapses</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ CBDC controls collapse</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Carbon rationing collapses</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Online harms penalties collapse</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Smart-meter enforcement collapses</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Bio-safety compliance collapses</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Population-health mandates collapse</span></div>
<div><span><br>
</span></div>
<div><span>Everything becomes toothless.</span></div>
<div><span><b><br>
</b></span></div>
<div><span><b>The message Canadians must hear. Stop S-206 and you
stop the digital control grid. Without S-206:</b></span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Agencies cannot issue instant penalties</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Treaties cannot be enforced domestically</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Carbon scoring becomes unenforceable</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ CBDC restrictions fail</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Travel scoring collapses</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Speech controls lose teeth</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Smart-meter compliance dies</span></div>
<div><span>▪︎ Surveillance becomes information-only</span></div>
<div><span>Remove the hub → the wheel falls off.</span></div>
<div><span>The simple undeniable takeaway. The other bills are
distractions.</span></div>
<b><span>S-206 is the enforcement engine. If we defeat S-206, we
break the digital-ID agenda. This is the bill we MUST kill —
now.</span><br>
</b></div>
<div style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span><b>To
oppose the passage of Bill S-206 (National Framework for a
Guaranteed Livable Basic Income Act), individuals and groups
can take the following actions:</b></span>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span>Contact Elected Representatives:</span></div>
<div><span>Reach out to your Senator and Member of Parliament to
express concerns. Emphasize fiscal responsibility, potential
impacts on work incentives, or jurisdictional overreach.
Personalized messages carry more weight than form letters.</span></div>
<div><span>Engage in Public Consultations:</span></div>
<div><span>During the committee review stage, the Senate may
accept written submissions or invite public testimony. Submit
evidence-based concerns about cost, implementation risks, or
alternatives to a guaranteed income.</span></div>
<div><span>Mobilize Public Opposition:</span></div>
<div><span>Start or join petitions, organize community
discussions, or use social media to raise awareness. Highlight
specific concerns such as the $107 billion estimated cost or
fears of centralized government control.</span></div>
<div><span>Leverage Fiscal Arguments:</span></div>
<div><span>Cite analyses from the Parliamentary Budget Officer
(PBO) and argue that such a transformative policy requires an
electoral mandate. As Senator Michael L. MacDonald stated,
major fiscal changes should be decided by voters, not through
private members' bills.</span></div>
<div><span>Support Alternative Solutions:</span></div>
<span>Advocate for targeted poverty reduction measures—such as
expanded housing, childcare, or wage supports—instead of a
universal basic income, to address root causes without systemic
overhaul.</span><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"
class="protonmail_signature_block">
<div
class="protonmail_signature_block-user protonmail_signature_block-empty">
<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>