[Freefromwar] is their any problem with this new legislation pushed forward by the liberal party

[Arthur Blomme]

>From Tamara Plant Dancer, [12/11/25 6:22 AM] on a Telegram group today:

Kill Bill S-206! ⚠️*A legislative blitz to hide one central pillar: Bill 
S-206. *They are flooding Parliament with distraction bills so the 
public is overwhelmed and cannot see the one bill that makes the entire 
system possible. More than a dozen federal bills are advancing 
simultaneously — each attacking a different pillar of Canadian freedom. 
They fall into clear clusters:

*Bills attacking due process and court rights*
Bill S-206 — Administrative Monetary Penalties (the central pillar) 
enables penalties without hearings, judges, trials, or *common-law 
protections.*
Bill C-63 — Online Harms Act. Undefined “harm,” digital speech 
penalties, CRTC enforcement authority.
Bill C-27 — Digital Charter Act. Creates federal AI regulators empowered 
to issue compliance orders without court oversight.
Bill C-52 — Beneficial Ownership Transparency. Expands federal 
surveillance and administrative enforcement.

*Bills attacking parliamentary supremacy (power shift to agencies).*
Bill C-26 — Critical Cyber Systems Act. Sweeping regulation by 
order-in-council, bypassing Parliament.
Bill C-11 — Online Streaming Act. Gives the CRTC unprecedented control 
over content curation and digital reach.
Bill C-18 — Online News Act. Allows federal regulators to determine 
access to, and compensation for, digital journalism.

*Bills attacking property rights.*
Bill C-234 — Agricultural Fuel Restrictions. Expands federal control 
over farm operations and production.
Bill S-241 — Jane Goodall Act. Sweeping bio-safety authority over 
wildlife, land, and private property.
Bill C-49 — Atlantic Accord Amendments. Expands federal control over 
offshore land, climate restrictions, and energy development.

*Bills attacking freedom of speech and assembly*
Bill C-63 — Online Harms Act. Criminalizes undefined “harm,” empowers 
bureaucrats to judge speech.
Bill C-261 — Misleading Communications Act. Penalties for “misleading” 
*speech* — undefined and discretionary. (is your phone listening?)
Bill C-70 — Foreign Interference Act. Mass surveillance powers with 
vague thresholds.

*Bill attacking religion freedom*
Bill C-9 — “Harmful Conduct” Redefinition. Allows the state to regulate 
spiritual beliefs and pastoral work under “harm.”

*The critical pattern. Different bills, different sectors and different 
rights being attacked. But here is the truth: Every single one of these 
bills depends on ONE central enforcement pillar, and that pillar is:*
Bill S-206 — The Administrative Penalty Switch
Bill S-206, the hub of the entire system, gives federal departments the 
power to issue penalties without:
▪︎ a hearing
▪︎ a judge
▪︎ a trial
▪︎ due process
▪︎ common-law protections
▪︎ judicial review in practice
It turns federal agencies into their own courts — investigator, 
prosecutor, judge, and enforcer. No democracy on Earth should tolerate this.
*This is the enforcement engine behind:*
▪︎ Digital ID
▪︎ CBDCs
▪︎ Carbon allowances
▪︎ Biosafety / One Health rules
▪︎ Smart-meter penalties
▪︎ Travel scoring
▪︎ Online speech controls
▪︎ Zoning & land-use mandates

Data alone cannot control a population. They need the power to punish. 
  S-206 provides it. Remove the keystone → the arch collapses.
*Why scatter us with other bills? Because if Canadians focus on S-206, 
the agenda dies. The distraction bills serve one purpose:*
▪︎ to scatter attention and exhaust the public.
▪︎ to keep citizens debating side issues
▪︎ to hide the enforcement bill under noise
▪︎ to make resistance impossible to organize
▪︎ to create outrage fatigue
*This is how large control systems are built — through distraction 
around the edges while the core is slipped into place.*
What are they building - and why S-206 is the core. Here is the 
architecture of the planned digital-governance system:
▪︎ Digital ID → who you are
▪︎ CBDCs → what you buy
▪︎ Carbon scoring → how you move & heat your home
▪︎ Online harms laws → what you say
▪︎ Smart meters → how you use utilities
▪︎ Bio-safety / One Health → what you grow, raise, or own
▪︎ Zoning & climate programs → where you can live and build
*But these systems cannot control people without instant punishment.*
*That punishment system = Bill S-206. S-206 even enables conditions on 
federal benefits, including:*
▪︎ pensions
▪︎ old age security
▪︎ disability payments
▪︎ income supports

*Departments under health and social development could attach 
requirements involving:*
▪︎ vaccination
▪︎ digital ID compliance
▪︎ health status tracking
▪︎ “population health” goals (including reproductive metrics)

*Covid revealed the blueprint. S-206 provides the legal mechanism. Our 
strategy must be laser-focused. We can fight 20 bills and lose…*
*Or we can defeat the one bill that enables all the others.*
*If S-206 falls:*
▪︎ Digital ID enforcement collapses
▪︎ CBDC controls collapse
▪︎ Carbon rationing collapses
▪︎ Online harms penalties collapse
▪︎ Smart-meter enforcement collapses
▪︎ Bio-safety compliance collapses
▪︎ Population-health mandates collapse

Everything becomes toothless.
*
*
*The message Canadians must hear. Stop S-206 and you stop the digital 
control grid. Without S-206:*
▪︎ Agencies cannot issue instant penalties
▪︎ Treaties cannot be enforced domestically
▪︎ Carbon scoring becomes unenforceable
▪︎ CBDC restrictions fail
▪︎ Travel scoring collapses
▪︎ Speech controls lose teeth
▪︎ Smart-meter compliance dies
▪︎ Surveillance becomes information-only
Remove the hub → the wheel falls off.
The simple undeniable takeaway. The other bills are distractions.
*S-206 is the enforcement engine. If we defeat S-206, we break the 
digital-ID agenda. This is the bill we MUST kill — now.
*

*To oppose the passage of Bill S-206 (National Framework for a 
Guaranteed Livable Basic Income Act), individuals and groups can take 
the following actions:*

Contact Elected Representatives:
Reach out to your Senator and Member of Parliament to express concerns. 
Emphasize fiscal responsibility, potential impacts on work incentives, 
or jurisdictional overreach. Personalized messages carry more weight 
than form letters.
Engage in Public Consultations:
During the committee review stage, the Senate may accept written 
submissions or invite public testimony. Submit evidence-based concerns 
about cost, implementation risks, or alternatives to a guaranteed income.
Mobilize Public Opposition:
Start or join petitions, organize community discussions, or use social 
media to raise awareness. Highlight specific concerns such as the $107 
billion estimated cost or fears of centralized government control.
Leverage Fiscal Arguments:
Cite analyses from the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) and argue that 
such a transformative policy requires an electoral mandate. As Senator 
Michael L. MacDonald stated, major fiscal changes should be decided by 
voters, not through private members' bills.
Support Alternative Solutions:
Advocate for targeted poverty reduction measures—such as expanded 
housing, childcare, or wage supports—instead of a universal basic 
income, to address root causes without systemic overhaul.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.integralshift.ca/pipermail/freefromwar-integralshift.ca/attachments/20251221/85a17761/attachment.htm>